Greg
I have learned over the years the internet communications has its limitations. Generally if you cannot convey your information in two email exchanges the chance of doing it further emails diminishes greatly. If this topic is of real interest to you give me a call and I will put you in touch with Rutger, Bernd, Peter, Jurgen or one of the other manufactures of high end motor drive circuits who can go into the theory of this in whatever depth you desire.
If we were talking about brushless motors then indeed the flywheel mass would be way too small to serve a useful purpose. Indeed a brushless moter is the gold standard. There are a lot of brushless motors in model railroad applications and they have a very big advantage of extremely smooth and uniform operation over the full 360 degrees of operation. A brush motor is different. The operation between poles is not uniform or smooth. If you measure the stall current using the resistance test you will also generally find a difference in each pole. When you rotate the motor you can feel the poles. It all adds up.
Do the math. When you have a PWM of 25-35KhZ even a 9 pole motor will have a very uneven operation when measured from the time one pole energizes the motor to the time the next pole energizes the motor. When you pulse and measure the motor at 30khZ using a modern microprocessor, the time between poles from the perspective of the micro is a very long time, especially in slow speed operations.
A flywheel, even a very small one will tend to integrate these difference and present a more unified operation over the rotation of the motor. From a simplistic standpoint it makes the brush motor appear more like the brushless one.
As you can see this topic has wondered far from the initial questions and is beginning to get into a depth not of real interest to most of the readers here. Again if you have a real interest in this topic give me a call and we can work through it or get you in touch with the right people who can explain the theory better than I can.
Stan
www.tttrains.com/largescale
I have learned over the years the internet communications has its limitations. Generally if you cannot convey your information in two email exchanges the chance of doing it further emails diminishes greatly. If this topic is of real interest to you give me a call and I will put you in touch with Rutger, Bernd, Peter, Jurgen or one of the other manufactures of high end motor drive circuits who can go into the theory of this in whatever depth you desire.
If we were talking about brushless motors then indeed the flywheel mass would be way too small to serve a useful purpose. Indeed a brushless moter is the gold standard. There are a lot of brushless motors in model railroad applications and they have a very big advantage of extremely smooth and uniform operation over the full 360 degrees of operation. A brush motor is different. The operation between poles is not uniform or smooth. If you measure the stall current using the resistance test you will also generally find a difference in each pole. When you rotate the motor you can feel the poles. It all adds up.
Do the math. When you have a PWM of 25-35KhZ even a 9 pole motor will have a very uneven operation when measured from the time one pole energizes the motor to the time the next pole energizes the motor. When you pulse and measure the motor at 30khZ using a modern microprocessor, the time between poles from the perspective of the micro is a very long time, especially in slow speed operations.
A flywheel, even a very small one will tend to integrate these difference and present a more unified operation over the rotation of the motor. From a simplistic standpoint it makes the brush motor appear more like the brushless one.
As you can see this topic has wondered far from the initial questions and is beginning to get into a depth not of real interest to most of the readers here. Again if you have a real interest in this topic give me a call and we can work through it or get you in touch with the right people who can explain the theory better than I can.
Stan
www.tttrains.com/largescale