I have been reading lots of posts about getting the turnout back to parallel and my conclusion is a #5 with a 1/2 length of 22" radius. Does that sound correct?
I find it hard to believe that Bachmann design EZ Track with such odd angles and spurs and then don't give the dimensions and angles of either. I was going to ask, "What were they thinking" but it is obvious that the designer has never constructed a train set in his life and obviously cannot think. Wouldn't a "normal" person link a turnout with a complementary product to accomplish the easy implementation of a turnout to parallel track with a resulting common length?
I find it hard to believe that Bachmann design EZ Track with such odd angles and spurs and then don't give the dimensions and angles of either. I was going to ask, "What were they thinking" but it is obvious that the designer has never constructed a train set in his life and obviously cannot think. Wouldn't a "normal" person link a turnout with a complementary product to accomplish the easy implementation of a turnout to parallel track with a resulting common length?