As a Canadian, whose family for five generations was heavily involved in Railroading, rolling stock did not include locomotives.
Please read the Forum Code of Conduct >>Click Here <<
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: rogertra on December 26, 2011, 12:21:23 AMQuote from: Limey on December 25, 2011, 09:54:06 AM
Mr. Bachmann,
Further to a post by IHC360 about the lack of C.N. rolling stock, I was wondering if your company had any plans to bring out a 4-8-4 in C.N. livery.
You do the 4-8-2 Hvy. Mntn. of which C.N. only had 79 locomotives but have neglected the 4-8-4 of which they had 182. Please consider this great loco for future production either in C.N. livery or painted/undecorated. DCC equipped would be nice, with sound would be even better.
I really like your products now that your quality control has improved immensely.
Regards, Limey.
Oh hope not!
The Bachmann 4-8-4 looks nothing like a CNR Northern.
Take heart, the 2-10-2 was found on the CNR. Change the cab over to the enclosed type and you have a close version.
Quote from: RAM on December 16, 2011, 10:14:36 PM
I stand by my statement. Bachmann never made a model of T&P 2-10-4. Yes they took a model of a Santa Fe 2-10-4 and lettered it for T&P.
Quote from: IHC650 on December 15, 2011, 09:17:33 PM
I really don't care weather it is originale or American conversions I would just like to see more Canadian rolling stock there many varieties of hoppered grain cars but a very slim choice of boxcars and flatdecks.
Quote from: RAM on December 16, 2011, 12:08:27 AM
Bachmann never made a model of the Texas Pacific 2-10-4. There was a brass model made 20 years or so ago.
Quote from: Sakda50 on November 29, 2011, 03:15:36 AM
Thanks to all. Completely agree that prototypical 2-10-4 shouldn't be on 22" curve. We all have to fudge sometimes. I have limited space and just wanted to see the loco run sometimes. Bachmann suggested 22" curves as minimum and this clearly is not possible so wanted to know if it was 'me' or does evryone have the same problem. Bachmann needs to suggest realistic track arrangements. Really wish I had a bigger layout. Have retired this loco to the display case. Thanks for all of your comments.
Quote from: Pacific Northern on November 09, 2011, 07:20:47 PMQuote from: rogertra on November 09, 2011, 12:47:05 AMThe 2-6-2 may have not been popular with all of the class 1 railroads however they did find acceptance with the following RailroadsQuote from: Doneldon on November 08, 2011, 10:13:53 PM
PacNo-
The various brass Santa Fe Prairies sell for pretty hefty prices reflecting, I think, a significant demand for these versatile locomotives. I'm not sure why no one offers a decent, affordable 2-6-2 these days. It seems to me that the investment in tooling would be well rewarded. Of course no one ever asks me about such things.
-- D
Simple. Because the 2-6-2 wheel arrangement was not that popular in North America, Sante Fe and a couple of other roads excepted. Logging roads don't count as they are not common carriers and were, in most cases, simply industrial lines.
Chicago, Burlington Quincy
Great Northern
Santa Fe
Illinois Central
Milwaukee
Northern Pacific
Wabash