I agree with Ton.
The Peco track is very good, and properly weathered and ballasted, really looks the part.
Additionally, I agree that the turnouts have a very negative 'contact', relying only upon the small area of contact between the point blades and the adjoining rail web surfaces. These requires regular cleaning, to ensure good current flow. (It's a pity that Peco didn't adopt the additional 90 degree 'finger' contact point, as is used in their very reliable HO / OO turnouts.) Ton's solution seems quite good.
Apart from these small points (pun intended!) the Peco product fills the bill admirably!
John
The Peco track is very good, and properly weathered and ballasted, really looks the part.
Additionally, I agree that the turnouts have a very negative 'contact', relying only upon the small area of contact between the point blades and the adjoining rail web surfaces. These requires regular cleaning, to ensure good current flow. (It's a pity that Peco didn't adopt the additional 90 degree 'finger' contact point, as is used in their very reliable HO / OO turnouts.) Ton's solution seems quite good.
Apart from these small points (pun intended!) the Peco product fills the bill admirably!
John
![Smiley :)](https://www.bachmanntrains.com/home-usa/board/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)